After his father abandoned him they remained focused on the Plaintiff and she did not even have custody.
Parent states neither of her 2 children were removed at birth despite her dirty drug screens, and prior cases.
This order required that the social workers reasons for removing any child must be "mission critical"
After the Plaintiff found out there were no minutes on the docket they added this document and named it "Minutes."
AAG files unagreed and unsigned dependency order to the official docket in the Plaintiffs ongoing state case.
The Plaintiffs child won many awards and she loved going to school.
Proof the Plaintiff provided a clean drug screen 3 days prior to removal in 2020.
One of the many first complaints filed against judge Messitt.
Correspondence from the doctor, after the Plaintiff found out online that her medication may have been the cause of the dirty drug screens.
All Defendants already had the Plaintiffs child attendance records from her school.
All Defendants were also made aware by the Principal that the Plaintiffs child had no discipline records to send, when CPS requested these records.
The Brief filed by the Plaintiffs attorney after she appealed the decision at her trial in October 2020.
All text communication to and from the teacher as required for parent pickup after school.
Court officials unlawfully defaulted to the father, they knew the Plaintiff would never sign anything for them.
They can change the docket all they want but they can't unsend the email they sent containing the original docket list.